Triple

T2896875
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Treaty of London (1718) E63960 entity
Predicate typeOfDiplomacy P42068 FINISHED
Object balance-of-power diplomacy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: balance-of-power diplomacy | Statement: [Treaty of London (1718), typeOfDiplomacy, balance-of-power diplomacy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfDiplomacy
Context triple: [Treaty of London (1718), typeOfDiplomacy, balance-of-power diplomacy]
  • A. diplomaticPolicy chosen
    Indicates the stance, strategy, or set of guiding principles an entity adopts in managing its diplomatic relations and interactions with others.
  • B. typeOfDiplomaticRole
    Indicates the specific kind or category of diplomatic position or function that an entity holds in relation to another.
  • C. diplomaticRole
    Indicates that an entity holds or has held an official diplomatic position or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. diplomaticRelation
    Indicates a formal relationship of negotiation, communication, or representation between political entities, typically states or governments.
  • E. diplomaticOutcome
    Indicates the result or consequence of a diplomatic interaction, negotiation, or relationship between parties.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4c45822c8190830c5f2bb97bcfd0 completed March 6, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abe08e7b248190a6bb0f6999f99c23 completed March 7, 2026, 8:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd17bcdc8190aa47274a50ba4ad4 completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:08 p.m.