Triple

T28968396
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1986 NCAA Division I-A football championship E732102 entity
Predicate runnerUpFinalRecord P166069 FINISHED
Object 11–1 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 11–1 | Statement: [1986 NCAA Division I-A football championship, runnerUpFinalRecord, 11–1]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: runnerUpFinalRecord
Context triple: [1986 NCAA Division I-A football championship, runnerUpFinalRecord, 11–1]
  • A. runnerUp
    Indicates that one entity finished in second place relative to another in a competition or ranking.
  • B. runnerUpRecordEnteringFinals
    Indicates that an entity held the second-best performance or ranking record at the time of entering the finals.
  • C. runnerUpWins
    Indicates that an entity finishes in second place in a competition or ranking and receives the corresponding runner-up victory or award.
  • D. runnerUpRank
    Indicates the position or ranking assigned to an entity that finishes immediately after the winner (or near the top) in a competition or ordered list.
  • E. runnerUpScore
    Indicates the score achieved by the participant or entity that finished in second place in a competition or ranking.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043ee242c8190b063248b417c5a69 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65c2ee360819096cf112e4bcde260 completed May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659d02f1c8190831758ac52bb54e4 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65b136b30819090cf59fb772f35f1 completed May 2, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:53 a.m.