Triple
T2896062
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle for Caen |
E63941
|
entity |
| Predicate | opponentStrategy |
P43855
|
FINISHED |
| Object | German defensive holding action south of Caen |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German defensive holding action south of Caen | Statement: [Battle for Caen, opponentStrategy, German defensive holding action south of Caen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opponentStrategy Context triple: [Battle for Caen, opponentStrategy, German defensive holding action south of Caen]
-
A.
strategyWhenInOpposition
Indicates the strategic approach or tactics an entity adopts specifically when it is in an oppositional or adversarial position relative to another.
-
B.
opponentState
Indicates the condition or status that an opposing party or competitor is currently in within a given context or interaction.
-
C.
opponentStrength
Indicates the level or degree of power, skill, or capability possessed by an opposing party in a competitive or adversarial context.
-
D.
opponentObjective
Indicates that one entity is the target or goal that an opposing entity aims to counter, defeat, or prevent from succeeding.
-
E.
hasCommonTacticOfOpponents
Indicates that two or more entities share the same tactic or strategy used by their respective opponents.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c45822c8190830c5f2bb97bcfd0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abe08c85c48190bd8c0f6680fca0c8 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd17bcdc8190aa47274a50ba4ad4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abde0f4c648190b9812e64f30c39da |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:08 p.m.