Triple

T28959597
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crank It Up E731859 entity
Predicate hasMusicProducer P17041 FINISHED
Object David Guetta NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: David Guetta | Statement: [Crank It Up, hasMusicProducer, David Guetta]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicProducer
Context triple: [Crank It Up, hasMusicProducer, David Guetta]
  • A. hasSongwriterProducerRelationshipWith
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the songwriter and/or producer for another entity’s musical work.
  • B. hasMusicalArtistRoleOfCreator
    Indicates that the specified musical artist serves as the creator (e.g., composer, originator) of the referenced musical work or content.
  • C. hasMusicalComposer
    Indicates that one entity serves as the musical composer responsible for creating the music associated with another entity.
  • D. notableProducer chosen
    Indicates that an entity is a significant or well-known producer associated with another entity, such as a work, product, or project.
  • E. hasRemixProducer
    Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043ee242c8190b063248b417c5a69 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f75dc25fa08190b371faf36d9fb72c completed May 3, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f758586534819083e91172f4bf5098 completed May 3, 2026, 2:14 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:49 a.m.