Triple

T28957425
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Antucoya mine E731200 entity
Predicate heapLeaching P166063 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Antucoya mine, heapLeaching, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heapLeaching
Context triple: [Antucoya mine, heapLeaching, true]
  • A. eraOfMajorMiningActivity
    Indicates the time period during which significant or primary mining operations took place for the associated entity.
  • B. miningSite
    Indicates a location where mining activities or mineral extraction operations take place.
  • C. wasExtensivelyMinedIn
    Indicates that a location or resource was subject to intensive or large-scale mining activity during a specified time or by a specified agent.
  • D. economicGeology
    Indicates a relationship where geological features, materials, or processes are studied or evaluated in terms of their economic value, such as for resource exploration, extraction, or utilization.
  • E. environmentalRemediation
    Indicates actions or processes undertaken to remove, reduce, or neutralize pollution or environmental damage in order to restore a site or ecosystem to a safer or more natural condition.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043eb9bcc819091ac7b07aecb6475 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65bbd8b188190bb8c1a0dbdbbccc6 completed May 2, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659d02f1c8190831758ac52bb54e4 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65b136b30819090cf59fb772f35f1 completed May 2, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:48 a.m.