Triple

T28950405
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nisa PDO E730995 entity
Predicate hasLegalProtectionIn P38312 FINISHED
Object European Union NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: European Union | Statement: [Nisa PDO, hasLegalProtectionIn, European Union]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalProtectionIn
Context triple: [Nisa PDO, hasLegalProtectionIn, European Union]
  • A. isLegallyProtected
    Indicates that an entity is safeguarded by law, granting it specific rights or restrictions against harm, use, or alteration.
  • B. isProtectedByLawIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity is safeguarded or granted legal protection within a specified jurisdiction or legal framework.
  • C. legalProtectionFor
    Indicates that one entity provides or is subject to legal safeguards, rights, or defenses in favor of another entity or interest.
  • D. hasLegalProtectionSince
    Indicates that an entity has been under formal legal protection starting from a specified date or point in time.
  • E. hasLegalRight
    Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043eb9bcc819091ac7b07aecb6475 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7626667f48190ad90867eb67ec582 completed May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f76175d6608190b60b268e20f49ed9 completed May 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:43 a.m.