Triple
T28931235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blasi |
E733785
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOnomasticRelation |
P175345
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Blaise |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Blaise | Statement: [Blasi, hasOnomasticRelation, Blaise]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOnomasticRelation Context triple: [Blasi, hasOnomasticRelation, Blaise]
-
A.
hasOnomasticField
Indicates a relationship where something is associated with a specific onomastic field, i.e., a domain or category related to names or naming conventions.
-
B.
hasNameMeaningRelation
Indicates that there is a relationship between an entity and a name that conveys or encodes a particular meaning or significance.
-
C.
hasEponymFamilyRelation
Indicates that one entity is named after another entity to which it is related by family or kinship.
-
D.
hasNameDayRelation
Indicates a relationship where a person’s name is associated with a specific name day or feast day in a calendar.
-
E.
hasNameEtymologyIn
Indicates that the origin or derivation of an entity’s name is based in, or traceable to, a specified source such as a language, place, or cultural context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b0b49b08190b8994b339c7980f6 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d1d916f881909575c2b22c416a5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe2183481908ae4e85a59c66f69 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6d0d331dc8190be5aa6bfc6365e67 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:28 a.m.