Triple

T28931215
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blasi E733785 entity
Predicate sharesLinguisticRootsWith P28322 FINISHED
Object Blaise NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Blaise | Statement: [Blasi, sharesLinguisticRootsWith, Blaise]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesLinguisticRootsWith
Context triple: [Blasi, sharesLinguisticRootsWith, Blaise]
  • A. sharesLinguisticFamilyWith
    Indicates that two languages belong to the same linguistic family or branch within a language family.
  • B. linguisticallyRelatedTo
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a linguistic relationship, such as sharing a common language, origin, structure, or other language-based association.
  • C. sharesEtymologyWith chosen
    Indicates that two terms originate from the same linguistic root or source word, or have closely related historical word origins.
  • D. hasCommonLoanwordsFrom
    Indicates that two languages share loanwords that originate from the same source language.
  • E. commonInLanguageFamily
    Indicates that the related items are frequently found or widely used across languages within the same language family.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b0b49b08190b8994b339c7980f6 completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd91a5dad8819093eeeef527027890 completed May 8, 2026, 7:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8f65fe9081908902500a3228d935 completed May 8, 2026, 7:23 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:28 a.m.