Triple
T2892974
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bytča |
E63869
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTownStatus |
P43827
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Bytča, hasTownStatus, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTownStatus Context triple: [Bytča, hasTownStatus, yes]
-
A.
hasMarketTownStatus
Indicates that a settlement holds the official legal or historical status of being recognized as a market town.
-
B.
hasTown
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a town as part of its structure, jurisdiction, or composition.
-
C.
hasTownship
Indicates that one administrative area or jurisdiction includes or is associated with a specific township.
-
D.
hasCityStatusSettlement
Indicates that a settlement possesses official recognition or designation as a city.
-
E.
hasCityStatusFor
Indicates that an entity holds official city status within the jurisdiction or context of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c45822c8190830c5f2bb97bcfd0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abe062234c81909411e34db7d2683d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd17bcdc8190aa47274a50ba4ad4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abde0f4c648190b9812e64f30c39da |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:07 p.m.