Triple

T28909111
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frances "Baby" Houseman E733167 entity
Predicate standsUpTo P175344 FINISHED
Object Jake Houseman NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jake Houseman | Statement: [Frances "Baby" Houseman, standsUpTo, Jake Houseman]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standsUpTo
Context triple: [Frances "Baby" Houseman, standsUpTo, Jake Houseman]
  • A. stands
    Indicates that an entity is in an upright position, typically supported by its feet or base, rather than sitting, lying, or moving.
  • B. standsAt
    Indicates that one entity is positioned upright at or near a specific location or reference point associated with another entity.
  • C. stoodFor
    Indicates that one entity represented, supported, or defended another entity, cause, or principle, often in a public or symbolic way.
  • D. endsUp
    Indicates that one entity ultimately arrives at, becomes, or results in another state, condition, or location after some process or sequence of events.
  • E. standingBasis
    Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, justification, or basis for another entity’s standing, status, or position in a given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b096d208190958a57d2e4b5a93a completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d1d916f881909575c2b22c416a5b completed May 3, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cfe2183481908ae4e85a59c66f69 completed May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6d0d331dc8190be5aa6bfc6365e67 completed May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:10 a.m.