Triple
T28904891
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thoughtcrime |
E733044
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusInOceania |
P132724
|
FINISHED |
| Object | capital crime |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: capital crime | Statement: [Thoughtcrime, legalStatusInOceania, capital crime]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusInOceania Context triple: [Thoughtcrime, legalStatusInOceania, capital crime]
-
A.
legalStatusInNSW
Indicates the legal status or standing of an entity under the laws and regulations specific to New South Wales (NSW).
-
B.
legalStatusOfIslands
Indicates the legal or sovereign status that applies to a given group of islands under relevant laws or treaties.
-
C.
legalStatusRecognizedIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity’s legal status is officially acknowledged or valid within a specified jurisdiction or legal system.
-
D.
legalStatusOfPhilippines
Indicates the legal or political status that the Philippines holds in relation to another governing authority or international framework.
-
E.
countrySpecificStatus
Indicates a status or condition that is defined or applied specifically in the context of a particular country.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b096d208190958a57d2e4b5a93a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd553d7cb881908d243e7a9f30ac85 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd514dcb1c81908333c70d7edd79c9 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:06 a.m.