Triple
T28904623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | government of Oceania |
E733038
|
entity |
| Predicate | maintainsState |
P39803
|
FINISHED |
| Object | permanent war |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: permanent war | Statement: [government of Oceania, maintainsState, permanent war]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maintainsState Context triple: [government of Oceania, maintainsState, permanent war]
-
A.
hasMaintained
Indicates that an entity has continued to keep another entity in a particular state, condition, or relationship over a period of time.
-
B.
maintainsThrough
chosen
Indicates that one entity preserves, upholds, or continues a state, condition, or relationship by means of another specified entity, process, or medium.
-
C.
stillMaintained
Indicates that the subject continues to be actively maintained or supported over time.
-
D.
maintainsThat
Indicates that one entity asserts, claims, or upholds a particular proposition, belief, or statement about something.
-
E.
maintainedDuring
Indicates that a certain condition, state, or relationship continues to hold throughout the duration of a specified event or time interval.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b096d208190958a57d2e4b5a93a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f8565134819096aac0175f924a9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f65fd1d08190b88e5e68ba268500 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:06 a.m.