Triple
T28904599
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | government of Oceania |
E733038
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRulingParty |
P42585
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ingsoc |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ingsoc | Statement: [government of Oceania, hasRulingParty, Ingsoc]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRulingParty Context triple: [government of Oceania, hasRulingParty, Ingsoc]
-
A.
governingPartyOfState
chosen
Indicates that a particular political party holds the primary governing authority over a given state.
-
B.
formerRulingPartyOf
Indicates that a political party once held ruling power over a country or region but no longer does.
-
C.
hasGovernmentOfficialParty
Indicates that a government official is affiliated with or belongs to a specific political party.
-
D.
hasRepresentativeParty
Indicates that an entity is officially represented or acted for by a particular political party or organized group.
-
E.
fullNameOfRulingParty
Indicates that the object is the complete official name of the political party currently in power or governing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b096d208190958a57d2e4b5a93a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67f7efc3c8190986d2d95b7a23729 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e40af9881908de3a4aa15f70a83 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:05 a.m.