Triple

T28902800
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mia Sara as Princess Lili E732993 entity
Predicate alternateScoreComposer P169971 FINISHED
Object Tangerine Dream NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tangerine Dream | Statement: [Mia Sara as Princess Lili, alternateScoreComposer, Tangerine Dream]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternateScoreComposer
Context triple: [Mia Sara as Princess Lili, alternateScoreComposer, Tangerine Dream]
  • A. alternativeScoring
    Indicates that there exists an additional or non-standard method of scoring or evaluation associated with the primary scoring system or context.
  • B. winnerComposer
    Indicates that the subject is the composer who won a particular contest, award, or competitive event.
  • C. alsoScoredFor
    Indicates that an individual who scored for one team or entity has also scored for another team or entity.
  • D. dedicatedComposerOfVariations
    Indicates that one entity is the composer specifically responsible for creating a set of musical variations associated with another entity.
  • E. usesCompositeScore
    Indicates that an entity bases its evaluation, decision, or outcome on a combined score derived from multiple underlying metrics or factors.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b08c2008190ac426a035a2ed66d completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f688d015908190ad5df37030ecf332 completed May 2, 2026, 11:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f68609c0b08190a8e1238a4d97c270 completed May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f688034580819086a0f9100645f8ba completed May 2, 2026, 11:25 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:04 a.m.