Triple

T28899390
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Poison E732911 entity
Predicate genderIdentityInSomeWesternMaterials P43613 FINISHED
Object cisgender woman LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cisgender woman | Statement: [Poison, genderIdentityInSomeWesternMaterials, cisgender woman]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: genderIdentityInSomeWesternMaterials
Context triple: [Poison, genderIdentityInSomeWesternMaterials, cisgender woman]
  • A. genderIdentityInSources
    Indicates that the gender identity of an entity is recorded or referenced in one or more information sources.
  • B. hasGenderIdentity chosen
    Indicates that an entity identifies with or experiences a particular gender.
  • C. genderVariants
    Indicates that one entity is a gender-related variant or alternative form of another (e.g., masculine/feminine/neuter versions of the same base entity).
  • D. publiclyIdentifiesAs
    Indicates that an entity openly declares or presents themself to others as having a particular identity or role.
  • E. genderVariation
    Indicates that one entity is a variant or alternative form of another entity that differs specifically in grammatical or biological gender.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b08c2008190ac426a035a2ed66d completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65b14512c8190a40e70319dcc54cd completed May 2, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659d02f1c8190831758ac52bb54e4 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:01 a.m.