Triple
T28896279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tyris Flare |
E732840
|
entity |
| Predicate | visualDesignEra |
P86807
|
FINISHED |
| Object | late 1980s arcade design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: late 1980s arcade design | Statement: [Tyris Flare, visualDesignEra, late 1980s arcade design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: visualDesignEra Context triple: [Tyris Flare, visualDesignEra, late 1980s arcade design]
-
A.
visualEra
chosen
Indicates the historical or stylistic period to which the visual appearance or design of something belongs.
-
B.
visualDesignInspiredBy
Indicates that the visual design of one entity is influenced, modeled, or derived from the visual style or appearance of another entity.
-
C.
productionDesignStyle
Indicates the visual and aesthetic approach used in designing the overall look and environment of a production.
-
D.
designAspect
Indicates that one entity represents a particular design-related feature, characteristic, or consideration of another entity.
-
E.
designTrend
Indicates a prevailing or emerging stylistic direction or pattern that influences how something is designed over a period of time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b08c2008190ac426a035a2ed66d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6617ba4a88190bfc5c305acb4f93f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660f082508190a95a7888ad66cb2e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:59 a.m.