Triple
T28896229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ax Battler |
E732839
|
entity |
| Predicate | teamMemberAlongside |
P106180
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tyris Flare |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tyris Flare | Statement: [Ax Battler, teamMemberAlongside, Tyris Flare]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: teamMemberAlongside Context triple: [Ax Battler, teamMemberAlongside, Tyris Flare]
-
A.
creativeTeamMember
Indicates that an entity participates as a member of a team responsible for creative work or production.
-
B.
partnerInOrganizationWith
Indicates that two entities are associated as partners within the same organization or organizational context.
-
C.
partnerInLeadershipWith
Indicates that two entities share a joint leadership role or responsibility, collaborating as partners in guiding or managing an organization, group, or initiative.
-
D.
partnerInWorkOf
chosen
Indicates a collaborative relationship where one entity works together with another on a shared task, project, or professional activity.
-
E.
associatedWithTeamMember
Indicates a relationship where an entity has a connection, involvement, or linkage with a specific member of a team.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b08c2008190ac426a035a2ed66d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65aa3d0588190bfc2122baa4fb5cd |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6576487e081908d802f1caf59c423 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:59 a.m.