Triple

T28890807
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oathbreakers of the Paths of the Dead E732687 entity
Predicate brokeOathTo P165496 FINISHED
Object Isildur NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Isildur | Statement: [Oathbreakers of the Paths of the Dead, brokeOathTo, Isildur]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brokeOathTo
Context triple: [Oathbreakers of the Paths of the Dead, brokeOathTo, Isildur]
  • A. penaltyForBreakingOath
    Indicates the punishment or negative consequence imposed when an oath is violated.
  • B. oath
    Indicates a formal, binding promise or pledge made by one party to uphold certain duties, truths, or obligations, often under conditions of solemnity or authority.
  • C. brokeTreatyWith
    Indicates that one party violated the terms of a formal agreement or treaty it had with another party.
  • D. breachedDuring
    Indicates that one entity violated, broke, or failed to uphold another entity (such as a rule, contract, or security measure) within a specified time period or event.
  • E. hasOathTo
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is bound by an oath or sworn commitment to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b07bdec819080cadfe147aa1f25 completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65a75dfc88190b919126bcafd64c7 completed May 2, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6576487e081908d802f1caf59c423 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65875030881909007c502b7dcc998 completed May 2, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:55 a.m.