Triple
T28886670
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charachar |
E732581
|
entity |
| Predicate | acclaim |
P135397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | critically acclaimed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: critically acclaimed | Statement: [Charachar, acclaim, critically acclaimed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: acclaim Context triple: [Charachar, acclaim, critically acclaimed]
-
A.
acclaimedFor
chosen
Indicates that an entity receives widespread praise or recognition specifically for another entity, such as a work, achievement, or contribution.
-
B.
acknowledgement
Indicates that one entity formally recognizes, accepts, or expresses appreciation for the actions, existence, or status of another entity.
-
C.
claimed
Indicates that an entity has asserted or stated something as true, often without definitive proof or verification.
-
D.
notablePraise
Indicates that one entity has given significant or distinguished praise or commendation to another entity.
-
E.
elegizes
Indicates composing or expressing a mournful or reflective lament, typically in honor of someone or something lost.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b07bdec819080cadfe147aa1f25 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65a72a4d08190a45476cd7a50a7cc |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65762b5e481908a30ca963dcba4be |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:51 a.m.