Triple

T28880711
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GW170814 E732408 entity
Predicate isConsistentWithGeneralRelativity P166899 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [GW170814, isConsistentWithGeneralRelativity, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConsistentWithGeneralRelativity
Context triple: [GW170814, isConsistentWithGeneralRelativity, yes]
  • A. generalRelativityConsistent chosen
    Indicates that the described theory, model, or scenario does not conflict with and adheres to the principles and predictions of general relativity.
  • B. reducesToGeneralRelativityWhen
    Indicates that a theory, model, or equation reproduces the predictions and form of general relativity under specified limiting conditions.
  • C. hasRelativisticEffects
    Indicates that the relationship or process involves velocities or gravitational fields high enough that relativistic (Einsteinian) corrections to classical physics become significant.
  • D. isPerturbativelyConsistent
    Indicates that a theory, model, or approximation remains mathematically well-defined and free of inconsistencies order by order in perturbation theory.
  • E. isEquiconsistentWith
    Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b06807c81909b4bbd4c20403a2b completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69edbb7648190bd89c57e0932eac1 completed May 3, 2026, 1:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69d17e8d48190b30bcc2f4bd81eb2 completed May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:43 a.m.