Triple

T28880702
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GW170814 E732408 entity
Predicate hasFinalBlackHoleMass P193832 FINISHED
Object 53.2 solar masses LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 53.2 solar masses | Statement: [GW170814, hasFinalBlackHoleMass, 53.2 solar masses]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFinalBlackHoleMass
Context triple: [GW170814, hasFinalBlackHoleMass, 53.2 solar masses]
  • A. secondaryBlackHoleMass
    Indicates the mass of the secondary (less massive) black hole in a binary or multi–black-hole system.
  • B. hasSupermassiveBlackHole
    Indicates that an astronomical object, such as a galaxy, contains or is associated with a supermassive black hole.
  • C. massOfCentralBlackHole
    Indicates the quantitative amount of mass possessed by the central black hole in a given system or context.
  • D. associatedBlackHole
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to a specific black hole, typically as its corresponding or related black hole.
  • E. hasSupermassiveBlackHoleMeasurementMethod
    Indicates the method or technique used to determine or measure the properties or presence of a supermassive black hole.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b06807c81909b4bbd4c20403a2b completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd57ba740c8190bd1d40166fccccb7 completed May 8, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd55ee82b881908a639da3a41b3af6 completed May 8, 2026, 3:18 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd57b9cdec81908536c4159e375931 completed May 8, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:43 a.m.