Triple
T28878734
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mars Attacks! trading cards |
E732353
|
entity |
| Predicate | conceptArtist |
P151036
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wally Wood |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wally Wood | Statement: [Mars Attacks! trading cards, conceptArtist, Wally Wood]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conceptArtist Context triple: [Mars Attacks! trading cards, conceptArtist, Wally Wood]
-
A.
creativeArtist
chosen
Indicates that one entity is an artist who creates or originates the work, performance, or creative output associated with another entity.
-
B.
coArtist
Indicates that two or more entities collaborate together as artists on the same creative work or project.
-
C.
composerOfDepictingWork
Indicates that an entity is the composer of a musical work that is itself a depiction or representation of another entity or subject.
-
D.
portraitArtist
Indicates that one entity is the artist who created a portrait depicting the other entity.
-
E.
inspiredArtist
Indicates that one artist has served as a source of creative influence or inspiration for another artist.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b06807c81909b4bbd4c20403a2b |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e6029a10819098ff21f58079e70e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6e3d5e8188190b1e1c2e5d1b77031 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:41 a.m.