Triple

T28859449
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fornicata E728819 entity
Predicate cellSymmetry P165670 FINISHED
Object often bilaterally symmetrical cells LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often bilaterally symmetrical cells | Statement: [Fornicata, cellSymmetry, often bilaterally symmetrical cells]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cellSymmetry
Context triple: [Fornicata, cellSymmetry, often bilaterally symmetrical cells]
  • A. localSymmetry
    Indicates that an entity exhibits symmetry within a localized region or subset of its structure, rather than across its entire extent.
  • B. symmetryOf
    Indicates that one entity is the symmetry counterpart or symmetric form of another entity, typically related by a specific symmetry operation or transformation.
  • C. cellArrangement
    Indicates how cells are organized or positioned relative to each other within a structure or system.
  • D. cellStructure
    Indicates the structural organization, components, and physical arrangement that make up a cell.
  • E. symmetryInvolved
    Indicates that a relationship or action inherently involves symmetry, such as invariance under certain transformations or the presence of symmetric structure or behavior.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f031a01cbc8190ba87270bb6fe4639 completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65a15e4c48190bcba6a5e930e2a9e completed May 2, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65762b5e481908a30ca963dcba4be completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f658ebeca4819096beb3f98f73fe31 completed May 2, 2026, 8:05 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:46 a.m.