Triple

T2884951
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee E59482 entity
Predicate challengedLaw P10247 FINISHED
Object Arizona out-of-precinct voting rule LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona out-of-precinct voting rule | Statement: [Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, challengedLaw, Arizona out-of-precinct voting rule]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedLaw
Context triple: [Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, challengedLaw, Arizona out-of-precinct voting rule]
  • A. challengedStatute chosen
    Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
  • B. legalDoctrineChallenged
    Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
  • C. constitutionalChallenge
    Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
  • D. precedentChallenged
    Indicates that an existing legal precedent is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
  • E. canBeChallengedOn
    Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac739188190a112f42a5a69c951 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abe04476588190b0db0880e14c79b5 completed March 7, 2026, 8:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd15cbf08190bf7fea5ea516848a completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:03 p.m.