Triple

T28825930
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tom Bertram E727902 entity
Predicate healthEventConsequence P812 FINISHED
Object forces him to confront his past conduct LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: forces him to confront his past conduct | Statement: [Tom Bertram, healthEventConsequence, forces him to confront his past conduct]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: healthEventConsequence
Context triple: [Tom Bertram, healthEventConsequence, forces him to confront his past conduct]
  • A. significantEventConsequence
    Indicates that one event leads to an important or impactful consequence for another event, state, or entity.
  • B. hasConsequence chosen
    Indicates that one event, action, or condition leads to or results in another as its outcome or effect.
  • C. healthEffect
    Indicates the impact or consequence that one entity has on the health or well-being of another.
  • D. consequenceOfInfluence
    Indicates that one event, state, or condition occurs as a result of the influence or impact exerted by another.
  • E. unexpectedConsequenceOf
    Indicates that one event, action, or condition occurs as an unforeseen or unintended result of another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0319d09088190bbf14cdf1987792a completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65a6c900881908f18b61273d7bf8d completed May 2, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659ce58408190ba9e007b4810d4d0 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:36 a.m.