Triple

T28817131
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Foltz Defender Bill E727667 entity
Predicate inLegalHistory P20840 FINISHED
Object considered a pioneering model for public defender statutes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: considered a pioneering model for public defender statutes | Statement: [Foltz Defender Bill, inLegalHistory, considered a pioneering model for public defender statutes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inLegalHistory
Context triple: [Foltz Defender Bill, inLegalHistory, considered a pioneering model for public defender statutes]
  • A. historicalLaw
    Indicates that the referenced law or legal provision existed and was in effect during a past historical period, rather than being current.
  • B. legalHistory chosen
    Indicates that there exists a record of past legal actions, cases, or statuses associated with an entity.
  • C. hasLegalStatusInHistoriography
    Indicates that an entity holds a particular recognized legal status or classification within historical or historiographical accounts of law and legal systems.
  • D. inLegalism
    Indicates that one entity adheres to, practices, or is governed by the principles or system of Legalism.
  • E. hasLawTradition
    Indicates that one legal system, jurisdiction, or entity follows or is based on a particular legal tradition or family of law.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0319d09088190bbf14cdf1987792a completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f658f44774819090ba520d0d95c6be completed May 2, 2026, 8:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65762b5e481908a30ca963dcba4be completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:33 a.m.