Triple
T28813508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 濃尾平野 |
E727577
|
entity |
| Predicate | 形成要因 |
P162093
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 木曽川の堆積作用 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 木曽川の堆積作用 | Statement: [濃尾平野, 形成要因, 木曽川の堆積作用]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 形成要因 Context triple: [濃尾平野, 形成要因, 木曽川の堆積作用]
-
A.
formedBy
Indicates that something comes into existence or is created as a result of a specific agent, process, or combination of components.
-
B.
hasCauseOfFormation
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the cause, origin, or formative factor leading to the creation or development of another entity.
-
C.
reasonForCreation
Indicates that one entity was created for the purpose, cause, or motivation specified by another entity.
-
D.
formationPrinciple
Indicates the underlying rule, pattern, or principle according to which something is formed, structured, or brought into existence.
-
E.
causeOf
Indicates that one entity brings about, produces, or is responsible for the occurrence or existence of another entity or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0319c38948190bca746ad60fd25ba |
completed | April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f658f163a88190b1dd222eaa0f93ea |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65762b5e481908a30ca963dcba4be |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:31 a.m.