Triple
T28808589
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | bēl mīšari |
E727446
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleOfDeity |
P118406
|
FINISHED |
| Object | divine guarantor of law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divine guarantor of law | Statement: [bēl mīšari, roleOfDeity, divine guarantor of law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleOfDeity Context triple: [bēl mīšari, roleOfDeity, divine guarantor of law]
-
A.
roleOfReferencedDeity
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies the function, status, or position held by a deity that is referenced in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
typeOfDeity
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific kind or category of deity in relation to another.
-
C.
deityCategory
Indicates that one entity is classified as belonging to a particular category or type of deity in relation to another entity.
-
D.
otherDeity
Indicates that one deity is distinct from and not identical to another deity within a given context or system.
-
E.
discussesDeity
Indicates that one entity talks or writes about, analyzes, or otherwise engages in discourse concerning a deity or divine being.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0319c38948190bca746ad60fd25ba |
completed | April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65a6c900881908f18b61273d7bf8d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f659ce58408190ba9e007b4810d4d0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:30 a.m.