Triple
T28782300
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neo-Aristotelianism |
E726706
|
entity |
| Predicate | isContemporaryFormOf |
P150318
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Aristotelianism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aristotelianism | Statement: [Neo-Aristotelianism, isContemporaryFormOf, Aristotelianism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isContemporaryFormOf Context triple: [Neo-Aristotelianism, isContemporaryFormOf, Aristotelianism]
-
A.
isModernFormOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a newer or contemporary version, adaptation, or evolution of another earlier entity.
-
B.
hasModernStandardForms
Indicates that an entity possesses one or more contemporary, standardized versions or representations of itself.
-
C.
emergedInModernForm
Indicates that something developed into or appeared in its current recognizable form during the modern era.
-
D.
isTraditionalFormOf
Indicates that one entity is the historically established or customary version from which another, typically more modern or variant, form is derived.
-
E.
statusInModernUsage
Indicates how the usage or relevance of something is currently regarded or applied in contemporary contexts.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f03199997c8190b6ae43fb19312443 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69383222c81909d8baa04129d5c81 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690eb1e948190aab41a89969519a5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:20 a.m.