Triple
T28780442
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dover Area School District |
E726660
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrecedentFromCase |
P132725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intelligent design classified as a form of creationism for establishment clause analysis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intelligent design classified as a form of creationism for establishment clause analysis | Statement: [Dover Area School District, legalPrecedentFromCase, intelligent design classified as a form of creationism for establishment clause analysis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrecedentFromCase Context triple: [Dover Area School District, legalPrecedentFromCase, intelligent design classified as a form of creationism for establishment clause analysis]
-
A.
legalPrecedentFrom
chosen
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
B.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
-
C.
lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtHolding
Indicates that the lawsuit is connected to, influenced by, or governed by a specific holding or decision of the Supreme Court.
-
D.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
E.
legalCasePresided
Indicates that a particular legal case was overseen and directed by a specific judge or judicial authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f03199997c8190b6ae43fb19312443 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd4f39b5008190b83b3227ce22c509 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd4df17c548190a4e2a6fea70f7e10 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:19 a.m.