Triple

T28773317
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Syrian region E726468 entity
Predicate hasSignificantLanguageHistorically P145562 FINISHED
Object Aramaic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aramaic | Statement: [Syrian region, hasSignificantLanguageHistorically, Aramaic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSignificantLanguageHistorically
Context triple: [Syrian region, hasSignificantLanguageHistorically, Aramaic]
  • A. hasMajorityLanguageHistorically
    Indicates that a particular language has historically been the predominant or majority language within a given entity or region.
  • B. hasLinguisticHeritage
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with the linguistic background, tradition, or ancestry of another entity.
  • C. historicalLanguage
    Indicates that one language is a historical or earlier form/ancestor of another language.
  • D. historicalLanguageOfBearers
    Indicates that the specified language is historically spoken or used by the bearers of a given name, title, or designation.
  • E. hasLinguisticLegacy chosen
    Indicates that one entity has left a lasting influence or enduring impact on the language, linguistic practices, or linguistic development associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f03199997c8190b6ae43fb19312443 completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f73223675481908c1bc3208c0f5284 completed May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7317690108190b3aae2cd2e1d069e completed May 3, 2026, 11:28 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:16 a.m.