Triple

T28772854
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marcus Antonius (orator) E726457 entity
Predicate styleOfOratory P35511 FINISHED
Object practical and effective forensic speaking LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: practical and effective forensic speaking | Statement: [Marcus Antonius (orator), styleOfOratory, practical and effective forensic speaking]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleOfOratory
Context triple: [Marcus Antonius (orator), styleOfOratory, practical and effective forensic speaking]
  • A. rhetoricalStyle chosen
    Indicates the characteristic manner or technique of expression used in communication, such as tone, structure, and persuasive strategies.
  • B. hasOratory
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by skill or ability in public speaking or formal speech.
  • C. monologueStyle
    Indicates that an entity delivers or is presented in a monologue format, characterized by a single voice speaking at length without direct interaction from others.
  • D. commentarialStyle
    Indicates the manner or approach taken in writing or presenting commentary on a text, event, or subject.
  • E. toneOfEulogy
    Indicates the emotional tone or mood conveyed by a eulogy.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f03199997c8190b6ae43fb19312443 completed April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f674e06c9481909ed0ea736408f0d7 completed May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 completed May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:16 a.m.