Triple

T28754494
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gongsun Zan E731628 entity
Predicate loyaltyClaim P165285 FINISHED
Object nominally loyal to the Han emperor LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: nominally loyal to the Han emperor | Statement: [Gongsun Zan, loyaltyClaim, nominally loyal to the Han emperor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: loyaltyClaim
Context triple: [Gongsun Zan, loyaltyClaim, nominally loyal to the Han emperor]
  • A. loyaltyReason
    Indicates the reason or motivation behind one entity’s loyalty or allegiance to another.
  • B. loyaltySymbolizedBy
    Indicates that an instance of loyalty is represented or expressed by a particular symbol or emblem.
  • C. loyaltyRevealedIn
    Indicates that an entity’s loyalty becomes evident or is demonstrated through a particular situation, action, or context.
  • D. loyaltyIncentive
    Indicates a relationship where benefits or rewards are provided to encourage or recognize continued commitment or repeat engagement.
  • E. loyaltyIntegration
    Indicates the degree to which a loyalty or rewards program is connected, synchronized, or functionally embedded with another system, platform, or service.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043ed68a881909e858a06bab7a247 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f657f9d5248190b6f3f82f20f069a3 completed May 2, 2026, 8 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f651ada6048190a7b4a6981565dc3a completed May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6562ef4e4819082ce6abd41b74dc5 completed May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:09 a.m.