Triple

T28732256
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Caroline County Sheriff’s Office E730691 entity
Predicate mayCooperateWith P66836 FINISHED
Object state police NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state police | Statement: [Caroline County Sheriff’s Office, mayCooperateWith, state police]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayCooperateWith
Context triple: [Caroline County Sheriff’s Office, mayCooperateWith, state police]
  • A. mayCoordinate chosen
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or has the option to coordinate or work jointly with another entity.
  • B. mayEngageIn
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to participate in or perform a particular activity or interaction with another entity.
  • C. definesCooperationWith
    Indicates that one entity formally specifies or establishes the terms, scope, or nature of cooperative interaction with another entity.
  • D. cooperateThrough
    Indicates that entities work together or coordinate their actions by means of a specific intermediary, method, or channel.
  • E. hasCooperative
    Indicates that one entity participates in a cooperative relationship or partnership with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043eae0908190b28ce314686247d7 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f658ee40088190b71e1219407690d0 completed May 2, 2026, 8:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65760fd3081908ffe014a5e2bf069 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:59 a.m.