Triple

T28725358
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cao Fang E730205 entity
Predicate wasPuppetRuler P48920 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Cao Fang, wasPuppetRuler, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasPuppetRuler
Context triple: [Cao Fang, wasPuppetRuler, true]
  • A. wasPuppetRulerOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity served as a ruler of another entity while being controlled or heavily influenced by a separate, more powerful authority.
  • B. rulerOf
    Indicates that one entity holds governing authority or sovereignty over another entity, such as a person ruling a country or territory.
  • C. fatherIsRulerOf
    Indicates that the person who is the father holds the position of ruler or sovereign over the specified entity or domain.
  • D. reignedUnder
    Indicates that one entity exercised ruling authority or governance while being subordinate to, or under the higher sovereignty of, another entity.
  • E. regentOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the ruling authority or caretaker governing on behalf of another entity, typically during the latter’s minority, absence, or incapacity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043e91fe48190b73bcd8e08d433e0 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6570caa888190b05d9aa932648185 completed May 2, 2026, 7:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f651ac855481908e30c3b345d31356 completed May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:55 a.m.