Triple
T28719773
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scripta Minoa |
E730058
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReproductionOf |
P86892
|
FINISHED |
| Object | inscribed tablets |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inscribed tablets | Statement: [Scripta Minoa, hasReproductionOf, inscribed tablets]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReproductionOf Context triple: [Scripta Minoa, hasReproductionOf, inscribed tablets]
-
A.
hasReproduction
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a particular mode, process, or capability of reproduction.
-
B.
hasBeenReproducedIn
chosen
Indicates that something has been copied, replicated, or re-created in another medium, format, or context.
-
C.
hasReproductionType
Indicates the mode or method by which an entity reproduces or generates offspring.
-
D.
overseesReproductionsOf
Indicates that one entity has responsibility for supervising, managing, or controlling the creation or production of copies or reproductions of another entity.
-
E.
reproductionIncludes
Indicates that a broader reproductive process or category encompasses or contains a specific reproductive component, method, or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f043e91fe48190b73bcd8e08d433e0 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff779e3f0c8190a861f1e4000fd9d9 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff77202638819086e4b9f9c0bc7b31 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:52 a.m.