Triple
T28717020
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pathfinder lander |
E729986
|
entity |
| Predicate | communicationRelayFor |
P69005
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sojourner rover |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sojourner rover | Statement: [Pathfinder lander, communicationRelayFor, Sojourner rover]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: communicationRelayFor Context triple: [Pathfinder lander, communicationRelayFor, Sojourner rover]
-
A.
communicationRelayCapability
Indicates that an entity has the ability to relay or forward communications between other entities or systems.
-
B.
communicationService
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity provides or facilitates a means for another entity to exchange information or messages.
-
C.
communicationChannel
Indicates a medium or method through which information is transmitted between parties.
-
D.
communicationFunction
Indicates that one entity serves a communicative role or purpose in relation to another, such as conveying, mediating, or facilitating the exchange of information.
-
E.
communicationModel
Indicates the type or framework of communication used or assumed in the relationship between entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f043e7d5a4819094b18aca10b1e024 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f674e06c9481909ed0ea736408f0d7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:51 a.m.