Triple
T28696595
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CCSU v GCHQ |
E729432
|
entity |
| Predicate | sourceOfDoctrine |
P128686
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tripartite classification of judicial review grounds |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tripartite classification of judicial review grounds | Statement: [CCSU v GCHQ, sourceOfDoctrine, tripartite classification of judicial review grounds]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sourceOfDoctrine Context triple: [CCSU v GCHQ, sourceOfDoctrine, tripartite classification of judicial review grounds]
-
A.
hasTheologicalSourceIn
Indicates that something derives its theological basis, authority, or origin from a specified source.
-
B.
doctrinesKnownFrom
chosen
Indicates that certain doctrines are known, derived, or learned from a specified source.
-
C.
natureOfDoctrine
Indicates the fundamental character or type of a doctrine, specifying what kind of teaching or belief it is.
-
D.
historicalDoctrine
Indicates that one entity embodies, represents, or is associated with a doctrine, teaching, or set of principles originating from a past historical context.
-
E.
doctrinalInfluenceOn
Indicates that one doctrine has influenced, shaped, or contributed to the development of another doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f043e6e9688190b6bdd6e5665498ff |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67f0488bc819089fbd2d2478158d3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e3ed894819094c067c1ef624951 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:39 a.m.