Triple

T28694210
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Antamina copper-zinc deposit E729367 entity
Predicate geneticAssociation P165225 FINISHED
Object porphyry copper system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: porphyry copper system | Statement: [Antamina copper-zinc deposit, geneticAssociation, porphyry copper system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: geneticAssociation
Context triple: [Antamina copper-zinc deposit, geneticAssociation, porphyry copper system]
  • A. geneticAffinity
    Indicates a relationship where entities share a notable degree of genetic similarity or relatedness.
  • B. riskAlleleForDisease
    Indicates that a specific allele is associated with an increased risk of developing a particular disease.
  • C. hasPharmacogenomicAssociation
    Indicates that there is a documented relationship between a genetic variant and a drug’s response, efficacy, or toxicity.
  • D. geneticInfluence
    Indicates that one entity affects or contributes to the genetic traits, characteristics, or heredity of another entity.
  • E. associatedWithPhenotype
    Indicates that an entity has a documented connection or correlation with a particular phenotype or observable trait.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043e60b6c8190ac2cd042e77fe6e9 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65705a3048190a3728b695ba2ae65 completed May 2, 2026, 7:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f651ac855481908e30c3b345d31356 completed May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6562ef4e4819082ce6abd41b74dc5 completed May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:38 a.m.