Triple

T28685856
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Karnataka E729129 entity
Predicate sharedHistoricalBoundaryWith P93966 FINISHED
Object Telangana NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Telangana | Statement: [Karnataka, sharedHistoricalBoundaryWith, Telangana]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharedHistoricalBoundaryWith
Context triple: [Karnataka, sharedHistoricalBoundaryWith, Telangana]
  • A. hasSharedBorderHistoryWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities have a history of sharing a common border or boundary at some point in time.
  • B. historicBoundaryFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a historical boundary or border associated with another entity, typically reflecting past territorial or administrative limits.
  • C. haveSharedBorderSince
    Indicates that two entities have had a common boundary or border continuously from a specified point in time onward.
  • D. hasHistoricalBoundaryChanges
    Indicates that the boundaries of an entity have been altered at some point in its history.
  • E. borderHistory
    Indicates the historical changes, events, or status of borders between entities over time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043e60b6c8190ac2cd042e77fe6e9 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd7e364a648190a1e9e1d9fc76e99e completed May 8, 2026, 6:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd7bb547608190a3b04dddbca6b8bc completed May 8, 2026, 5:59 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:32 a.m.