Triple
T28680060
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | reasonablefaith.org |
E725982
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasApologeticsApproach |
P94364
|
FINISHED |
| Object | classical apologetics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: classical apologetics | Statement: [reasonablefaith.org, hasApologeticsApproach, classical apologetics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasApologeticsApproach Context triple: [reasonablefaith.org, hasApologeticsApproach, classical apologetics]
-
A.
hasApologeticApproach
Indicates that one entity adopts a remorseful, apologizing stance or strategy toward another entity or situation.
-
B.
hasApologeticAim
Indicates that an action, communication, or behavior is intended to express regret, remorse, or an apology toward another party.
-
C.
hasApologeticFunction
Indicates that something serves the role of expressing regret, remorse, or an apology in a given context.
-
D.
hasApologeticGoal
Indicates that an entity’s goal or intended outcome involves expressing regret, making amends, or otherwise apologizing for a past action or situation.
-
E.
hasEthicOrApproach
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is characterized by a particular ethic, principle, or methodological approach in its behavior or practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d867608819086bc3e6b4f9de866 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7675b12848190a3569cfda29c5b0e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f762f4b59481909f70074f11825bfb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:08 a.m.