Triple
T28679875
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Doctrine of Justification |
E725978
|
entity |
| Predicate | analyzesDoctrine |
P85544
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Protestant views of justification |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Protestant views of justification | Statement: [The Doctrine of Justification, analyzesDoctrine, Protestant views of justification]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: analyzesDoctrine Context triple: [The Doctrine of Justification, analyzesDoctrine, Protestant views of justification]
-
A.
examinesDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one entity critically studies, analyzes, or evaluates a particular doctrine or set of beliefs.
-
B.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
C.
appliedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
-
D.
currentDoctrine
Indicates the doctrine, policy, or set of guiding principles that is presently in force or officially adopted at a given time.
-
E.
codifiedDoctrine
Indicates that a set of beliefs, principles, or rules has been formally systematized and recorded as an official doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d867608819086bc3e6b4f9de866 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f658ee40088190b71e1219407690d0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65760fd3081908ffe014a5e2bf069 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:08 a.m.