Triple
T28657434
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz |
E725371
|
entity |
| Predicate | examinesThinker |
P45281
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plato |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plato | Statement: [The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz, examinesThinker, Plato]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: examinesThinker Context triple: [The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz, examinesThinker, Plato]
-
A.
discussesThinker
chosen
Indicates that one entity engages in discussion or analysis about a particular thinker or philosopher.
-
B.
examinesAuthor
Indicates that one entity critically studies, analyzes, or evaluates the work, ideas, or contributions of an author.
-
C.
hasThinkTank
Indicates that an entity is associated with, supported by, or operates a think tank as part of its activities or structure.
-
D.
reflectsIdeasOf
Indicates that one entity expresses, mirrors, or embodies the ideas, viewpoints, or conceptual content originating from another entity.
-
E.
philosophicalContributor
Indicates that one entity has made a significant contribution to the philosophical work, ideas, or discourse associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d84f5f0819087ab5e6143b14ed7 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6562fd3488190be1acd8c526a28d2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f651ac855481908e30c3b345d31356 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:56 a.m.