Triple

T28654217
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Moses Blah E725283 entity
Predicate laterTestifiedAgainst P81793 FINISHED
Object Charles Taylor NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Charles Taylor | Statement: [Moses Blah, laterTestifiedAgainst, Charles Taylor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterTestifiedAgainst
Context triple: [Moses Blah, laterTestifiedAgainst, Charles Taylor]
  • A. soughtTestimonyAgainst
    Indicates that one party actively attempted to obtain another party’s testimony to be used against a specified target in a legal or investigative context.
  • B. gaveTestimonyIn
    Indicates that one entity provided formal testimony or a statement in an official proceeding, event, or context associated with another entity.
  • C. testimonyAffects chosen
    Indicates that one party’s testimony has an influence or impact on another entity, situation, or outcome.
  • D. hasTestimony
    Indicates that an entity provides, contains, or is associated with a formal statement or account (testimony) about another entity or event.
  • E. ledAgainst
    Indicates that one entity directed or commanded an opposing effort, campaign, or force against another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d84f5f0819087ab5e6143b14ed7 completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fda94697c4819081291967202248be completed May 8, 2026, 9:13 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fda5973fcc8190a57daef31fb70a49 completed May 8, 2026, 8:57 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:54 a.m.