Triple
T28639490
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Idrīs |
E724879
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMeaningProposed |
P10718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interpreter |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interpreter | Statement: [Idrīs, hasMeaningProposed, interpreter]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMeaningProposed Context triple: [Idrīs, hasMeaningProposed, interpreter]
-
A.
hasMeaningInOriginLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a word, phrase, or symbol) possesses a specific meaning in its original or source language.
-
B.
possibleMeaning
chosen
Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
-
C.
hasMeaningViaJohn
Indicates that something possesses or conveys its meaning specifically through John as the interpretive or mediating agent.
-
D.
hasMeaningExtension
Indicates that one entity represents an extended, elaborated, or more detailed meaning of another entity’s meaning.
-
E.
hasProposed
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d8328c48190bc0e5f9b9b848582 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:43 a.m.