Triple

T28639065
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bludger E724869 entity
Predicate appearsInWorkOfFiction P105687 FINISHED
Object Quidditch NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Quidditch | Statement: [Bludger, appearsInWorkOfFiction, Quidditch]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appearsInWorkOfFiction
Context triple: [Bludger, appearsInWorkOfFiction, Quidditch]
  • A. usedInFictionalWork chosen
    Indicates that something (such as a concept, object, or character) appears or is employed within a specific fictional work.
  • B. hasPlaceInFiction
    Indicates that a fictional work or element is associated with, set in, or takes place within a particular fictional location or setting.
  • C. worksWithInFiction
    Indicates that two fictional characters are depicted as collaborating, interacting, or being associated with each other within a narrative work.
  • D. fictionalCharacterPortrayedFromWorkBy
    Indicates that a fictional character is depicted or portrayed in a work that was created by a specific author or creator.
  • E. hasFictionalWork
    Indicates that one entity is the creator, owner, or source of a fictional work associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d8328c48190bc0e5f9b9b848582 completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7308a096081909d66a56f3c926806 completed May 3, 2026, 11:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f72a00c5f081908b6539d15baf4e12 completed May 3, 2026, 10:57 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:42 a.m.