Triple
T28618175
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Online Responder |
E724318
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | OCSP responder |
C3159
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: OCSP responder Context triple: [Online Responder, instanceOf, OCSP responder]
-
A.
Authenticator Assurance Level
Authenticator Assurance Level is a measure of the strength and reliability of an authentication process, indicating the degree of confidence that the user’s claimed identity is accurate based on the types and combinations of authenticators used.
-
B.
TLS extension
A TLS extension is an optional, standardized addition to the TLS protocol that allows clients and servers to negotiate extra capabilities or parameters (such as supported protocols, server names, or security features) during the handshake.
-
C.
public key infrastructure component
chosen
A public key infrastructure component is an element (such as a certificate authority, registration authority, or repository) that issues, manages, stores, and validates digital certificates and cryptographic keys to enable secure, trusted communications.
-
D.
ASN.1 standard
The ASN.1 standard is a formal notation used to define, encode, transmit, and decode structured data in a platform- and language-independent way, commonly used in telecommunications and cryptographic protocols.
-
E.
interoperability certification
Interoperability certification is a formal validation process that confirms different systems, products, or services can reliably exchange and use information according to defined standards and protocols.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d822ac08190932de59ec2268ed2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:32 a.m.