Triple
T28616210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SetEnvironmentVariable |
E724278
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAnsiVariant |
P174376
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SetEnvironmentVariableA |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SetEnvironmentVariableA | Statement: [SetEnvironmentVariable, hasAnsiVariant, SetEnvironmentVariableA]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAnsiVariant Context triple: [SetEnvironmentVariable, hasAnsiVariant, SetEnvironmentVariableA]
-
A.
hasUnicodeVariant
chosen
Indicates that one entity has an alternative representation or equivalent form in Unicode corresponding to the other entity.
-
B.
hasVariant
Indicates that one entity exists as an alternative form, version, or variation of another entity.
-
C.
hasVariantText
Indicates that an entity is associated with an alternative or differing textual form of its content.
-
D.
hasVariantSystem
Indicates that one system is an alternative or variant form of another system within the same general framework or category.
-
E.
hasVariantUsage
Indicates that an entity is used in an alternative or non-standard way compared to its primary or canonical usage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d6a6b04c8190bee4cf9c00665ef7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d26ceb08819091c71c001e954936 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:32 a.m.