Triple

T28614659
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Local Configuration Manager E724246 entity
Predicate checksCompliance P54387 FINISHED
Object desired state LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: desired state | Statement: [Local Configuration Manager, checksCompliance, desired state]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: checksCompliance
Context triple: [Local Configuration Manager, checksCompliance, desired state]
  • A. evaluatesComplianceWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity assesses whether another entity or its behavior meets specified rules, standards, or requirements.
  • B. indicatesComplianceWith
    Indicates that one entity conforms to, satisfies, or adheres to the rules, standards, or requirements specified by another entity or framework.
  • C. providesCompliance
    Indicates that one entity supplies or ensures adherence to required rules, standards, or regulations for another entity.
  • D. regulatesComplianceWith
    Indicates that one entity oversees, enforces, or sets rules to ensure another entity adheres to specified standards, laws, or requirements.
  • E. complianceUse
    Indicates that something is used, implemented, or behaves in accordance with a specified rule, standard, or compliance requirement.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f652a492108190b885b955ce147d3c completed May 2, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f651aad92c8190b874b3b5f9f64434 completed May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:31 a.m.