Triple

T28613779
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HKEY_CURRENT_USER E724229 entity
Predicate logicalMirrorOf P165473 FINISHED
Object HKEY_USERS LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: HKEY_USERS | Statement: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER, logicalMirrorOf, HKEY_USERS]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicalMirrorOf
Context triple: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER, logicalMirrorOf, HKEY_USERS]
  • A. mirroredBy
    Indicates that one entity serves as a reflective counterpart or reversed representation of another.
  • B. mirroredOn
    Indicates that one entity is a reflective counterpart of another, such that its structure, appearance, or configuration is reversed or symmetrically aligned relative to the other.
  • C. mirroredAt
    Indicates that one entity is a mirror image or reflection of another entity with respect to a specified axis, plane, or point.
  • D. mirrorType
    Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of mirror in relation to another entity.
  • E. mirrorsStructureOf
    Indicates that one entity’s overall organization, pattern, or arrangement closely corresponds to and reflects the structure of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f659355a208190be2609ffc7a9c427 completed May 2, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6575d89788190aca478e4aea05a65 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65875030881909007c502b7dcc998 completed May 2, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:31 a.m.